Bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps) have become one of the most popular pet reptiles and in many cases are contributing to research as well. But as their popularity has soared, so too has the need to better understand what these lizards actually need to live well in captivity. Our latest study, recently published in PLOS ONE, examines whether giving bearded dragons more “naturalistic” resources within their enclosures actually improves their well-being. These enclosures included features like climbing structures, loose substrate, and multiple hiding spots, compared to standard setups with only basic furnishings. We expected these more complex spaces to help the lizards behave more naturally and experience less stress. While the naturalistic enclosures did offer better thermal variety (important for ectothermic animals like reptiles), we were surprised to find that they did not have a clear effect on how active the lizards were, how they used their space, or how often they showed signs of stress or relaxation.
Interestingly, only female lizards housed long-term in naturalistic enclosures showed lower levels of physiological stress (measured through ratios of white blood cells), suggesting that any benefits might be subtle or sex-specific.
Overall, our findings show that simply adding complexity to an enclosure isn’t enough to guarantee better welfare. It may be that lizards don’t perceive naturalistic and standard enclosures as very different, or that enclosure size matters more than what’s in it. For reptile owners and researchers alike, the take-home message is this: meaningful welfare improvements require us to think beyond aesthetics or what human caretakers assume is “good” or “natural”—we need to constantly evaluate our efforts and ask the animals themselves what they think.
The study is open access and available at the following link: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322682
Citation
Denommé, M and Tattersall, GJ. 2025. Influence of enclosure design on the behaviour and welfare of Pogona vitticeps. PLoS One 20(6): e0322682 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322682






