neuroscience

Oxytocin Neurons and the Rhythm of Warmth and Wakefulness

/ gtattersall

A new study led by Morgane Vandendoren, Nicole Bedford, and others from Adam Nelson’s lab at the University of Wyoming has uncovered a new role for oxytocin, the so-called “love hormone.” Published in eLife, the research shows that oxytocin neurons in the paraventricular hypothalamus act as a kind of biological switch, helping mammals transition from cooler, resting states to warmer, active ones. Using mice, the team combined calcium imaging, optogenetics, and behavioural observation to show that bursts of oxytocin neuron activity reliably occur just before an animal warms up and becomes active, even in the absence of social cues. These neurons appear to coordinate both thermogenic (heat-producing) and behavioral arousal, revealing a new layer of oxytocin’s influence that bridges physiology and behaviour.

This collaboration, with contributions from several Wyoming students and collaborators, demonstrates how oxytocin not only shapes social and maternal behaviours but also tunes the body’s thermal and arousal cycles. My lab’s involvement was a bit on the periphery, but focused on the thermal imaging and coding pipelines that helped visualize these rapid transitions in body temperature and activity. Together, the findings expand our understanding of oxytocin beyond its traditional social context, showing that it also plays a key role in the daily rhythm of energy balance and physiological readiness.

The University of Wyoming have a more detailed press release for the study here:

https://www.uwyo.edu/news/2025/10/uw-researchers-discover-love-hormone-has-role-in-regulating-daily-thermoregulatory-patterns-of-rest-and-arousal.html

This paper was published in eLife, following an open peer review approach that I am still trying to wrap my head around. The citation is below, and so formally the study is published in preprint format, with us having still to upload a revised manuscript which will address some of the points raised by the reviewers.

Citation

Vandendoren, M, Rogers, JF, Landen, JG, Killmer, S, Alimiri, B, Pohlman, C, Tattersall, GJ, Bedford, NL, Nelson, AC. 2025. Oxytocin neurons signal state-dependent transitions to thermogenesis and behavioral arousal in social and non-social settings. eLife, 14: RP108212. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.108212.1

Misconceptions and Set-Points

/ gtattersall

For decades, the concept of a thermoregulatory “set-point” has been a cornerstone of physiological research, yet its definition and application remain surprisingly inconsistent across disciplines. Our recent study, spear-headed by the inimitable Dr. Duncan Mitchell, soon to be published in Biological Reviews, revisits and clarifies this fundamental concept by bridging perspectives from control theory and thermal biology. We explore how the set-point framework has been misinterpreted, and we argue for a more precise definition rooted in negative feedback principles. By revisiting foundational work and integrating recent empirical data, we demonstrate that set-points should not be conflated with operating body temperatures. Instead, they represent the thresholds at which thermo-effectors—such as sweating, shivering, or behavioural thermoregulation—are activated. 

By incorporating an historical perspective, and combining control theory research with research into behavioural thermoregulation in lizards, our work highlights that, while lizards select body temperatures within a narrow range under stable conditions, their ability to do so is governed by multiple overlapping control mechanisms rather than a singular, static reference point.

This nuanced understanding has broad implications for comparative physiology and ecological research, especially in the face of climate change. The mischaracterization of set-points has led to confusion in both homeothermic and ectothermic species, potentially skewing interpretations of thermal adaptation and stress responses. By refining the definition of set-points within a rigorous control-theory framework, our study provides a clearer foundation for future research on thermal biology. We emphasize the importance of distinguishing between physiological thresholds and behavioral outcomes, urging researchers to adopt a systems-based approach to thermoregulation. Ultimately, our work seeks to reframe the discussion, ensuring that the next generation of studies can build on a more precise and unified conceptual framework.

This review is part of a series of “Misconceptions in thermal biology” papers, mainly from the Brain Function Research Group in South Africa, but the list of co-authors includes experts in thermal physiology and ecophysiology. Stay tuned for more papers in the future, and I encourage anyone new to thermoregulation and thermal biology research to read some of these.

Citation

Mitchell, D, Fuller, A, Snelling, EP, Tattersall, GJ, Hetem, RS, and Maloney, SK. 2025. Revisiting concepts of thermal physiology: understanding negative feedback and set-point in mammals, birds, and lizards. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70002

For other misconceptions in thermoregulation papers see:

https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12818

https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5721