animals

Relationship between “naturalistic enclosures” and lizard welfare not so simple

/ gtattersall

Bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps) have become one of the most popular pet reptiles and in many cases are contributing to research as well. But as their popularity has soared, so too has the need to better understand what these lizards actually need to live well in captivity. Our latest study, recently published in PLOS ONE, examines whether giving bearded dragons more “naturalistic” resources within their enclosures actually improves their well-being. These enclosures included features like climbing structures, loose substrate, and multiple hiding spots, compared to standard setups with only basic furnishings. We expected these more complex spaces to help the lizards behave more naturally and experience less stress. While the naturalistic enclosures did offer better thermal variety (important for ectothermic animals like reptiles), we were surprised to find that they did not have a clear effect on how active the lizards were, how they used their space, or how often they showed signs of stress or relaxation. 

Interestingly, only female lizards housed long-term in naturalistic enclosures showed lower levels of physiological stress (measured through ratios of white blood cells), suggesting that any benefits might be subtle or sex-specific. 

Overall, our findings show that simply adding complexity to an enclosure isn’t enough to guarantee better welfare. It may be that lizards don’t perceive naturalistic and standard enclosures as very different, or that enclosure size matters more than what’s in it. For reptile owners and researchers alike, the take-home message is this: meaningful welfare improvements require us to think beyond aesthetics or what human caretakers assume is “good” or “natural”—we need to constantly evaluate our efforts and ask the animals themselves what they think. 

The study is open access and available at the following link: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322682

Citation

Denommé, M and Tattersall, GJ. 2025. Influence of enclosure design on the behaviour and welfare of Pogona vitticeps. PLoS One 20(6): e0322682 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322682

A bearded dragon on top of cork bark. Photo credit Dr. Danilo Giacometti.

Unlocking the Motivations of Repetitive Behaviours in Reptiles

/ gtattersall

Our latest study (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106484) sheds light on a perplexing behaviour seen in captive reptiles, namely their interactions with barriers (IWB), a form of repetitive behaviour akin to pacing in mammals. As part of her PhD research, Melanie Denommé investigated the motivations behind IWB in bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps; Figure 1) over a three year period, and formally tested whether it stems from a “desire” to escape their enclosures.

Figure 1. Photo of a bearded dragon interacting with a barrier (called glass surfing sometimes if the lizard moves back and forth across the transparent barrier, although reptiles may do this on non-transparent barriers as well).

Our findings revealed a strong preference for performing IWB near the front barrier of their environment (Figure 2), the only known escape route; even when half of it was obscured; they also direct more of their behaviour toward the transparent part of the front barrier. Interestingly, IWB was 15 times more likely to occur around the time when lizards defecated, supporting an argument that these behaviours may be driven by escape-related motivations, at least with respect the need to find suitable defecation areas.  However, no clear link was found between IWB and anticipation of feeding, suggesting species-specific differences in how repetitive behaviours are triggered. Despite these results, lizards would still exhibit IWB with non-transparent barriers (Figure 2), suggesting that escape is not the exclusive explanation for these repetitive behaviours.

Figure 2. Results from multiple rounds of home cage observations of barrier wall interaction (minutes per day). Bearded dragons interacted more with the front barrier (that is, the barrier from which escape could occur), although still exhibited IWB (interacting with barriers) along the other 3 walls of the enclosure.

Seasonal and sex-related patterns offered further nuance. Contrary to expectations, female lizards performed IWB more during spring, while males showed consistent levels year-round. This might reflect frustrated breeding-season motivations, as females in the wild often roam widely in search of mates, a behaviour restricted in captivity. These findings emphasize the complex interplay between natural instincts and captive conditions, highlighting the importance of tailoring environments to better meet the needs of individual animals. By understanding these behaviours and using an evidence-based approach, we can deepen insights into the diverse causes of repetitive behaviours across species and thereby improve captive reptile welfare.

Note that the actual levels of IWB seen were low throughout the study, with numerous animals never performing the behaviour. There appear to be individual differences in the expression of IWB.

Citation

Denommé, M and Tattersall, GJ. 2025. Investigating the motivations of repetitive barrier interactions in Pogona vitticeps. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 283: 106484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106484

Shape-Shifting in the Face of Climate Change: The Long and the Short of How Australian Birds Are Adapting

/ gtattersall

As global temperatures rise, animals are facing mounting pressure to adapt, and Australian birds are no exception. Our recent research (from Sara Ryding’s PhD research) has examined over 5,000 museum specimens, representing 78 bird species across Australia, revealing clear changes in their body and appendage sizes. These changes are aligned with two well-known ecological principles: Bergmann’s rule, which predicts smaller body sizes in warmer climates in endotherms, and Allen’s rule, which argues that animals (namely endotherms) will develop larger appendages to regulate body heat. Consistent with these theories, our study found that birds are experiencing a long-term decrease in body size, particularly in absolute wing length, while their appendages, such as bills and tarsi (leg bones), are getting larger relative to their bodies. This phenomenon, often referred to as “shape-shifting,” is a widespread response to the increasing temperatures driven by climate change.

Interestingly, our research also highlights a more complex picture when it comes to short-term responses. While long-term trends show a clear increase in appendage size to aid thermoregulation, birds displayed smaller appendages in the years following hotter temperatures. This suggests that while birds are gradually adapting to rising temperatures over time, short-term weather events may create different selection pressures that affect growth and development. Factors like food availability and reproductive challenges could contribute to these opposing trends. This study underscores the intricate balance between long-term evolutionary changes and the immediate pressures exerted by fluctuating environmental conditions, offering critical insights into how birds—and potentially other animals—might continue to respond to our rapidly changing world.

For a link to the study, please see the citation below.

Citation

Ryding, McQueen, A, Klaassen, M, Tattersall, GJ, and Symonds, MRE. 2024. Long- and short-term responses to climate change in body and appendage size of diverse Australian birds. Global Change Biology, 30:e17517. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17517