For decades, the concept of a thermoregulatory “set-point” has been a cornerstone of physiological research, yet its definition and application remain surprisingly inconsistent across disciplines. Our recent study, spear-headed by the inimitable Dr. Duncan Mitchell, soon to be published in Biological Reviews, revisits and clarifies this fundamental concept by bridging perspectives from control theory and thermal biology. We explore how the set-point framework has been misinterpreted, and we argue for a more precise definition rooted in negative feedback principles. By revisiting foundational work and integrating recent empirical data, we demonstrate that set-points should not be conflated with operating body temperatures. Instead, they represent the thresholds at which thermo-effectors—such as sweating, shivering, or behavioural thermoregulation—are activated.
By incorporating an historical perspective, and combining control theory research with research into behavioural thermoregulation in lizards, our work highlights that, while lizards select body temperatures within a narrow range under stable conditions, their ability to do so is governed by multiple overlapping control mechanisms rather than a singular, static reference point.
This nuanced understanding has broad implications for comparative physiology and ecological research, especially in the face of climate change. The mischaracterization of set-points has led to confusion in both homeothermic and ectothermic species, potentially skewing interpretations of thermal adaptation and stress responses. By refining the definition of set-points within a rigorous control-theory framework, our study provides a clearer foundation for future research on thermal biology. We emphasize the importance of distinguishing between physiological thresholds and behavioral outcomes, urging researchers to adopt a systems-based approach to thermoregulation. Ultimately, our work seeks to reframe the discussion, ensuring that the next generation of studies can build on a more precise and unified conceptual framework.
This review is part of a series of “Misconceptions in thermal biology” papers, mainly from the Brain Function Research Group in South Africa, but the list of co-authors includes experts in thermal physiology and ecophysiology. Stay tuned for more papers in the future, and I encourage anyone new to thermoregulation and thermal biology research to read some of these.
Citation
Mitchell, D, Fuller, A, Snelling, EP, Tattersall, GJ, Hetem, RS, and Maloney, SK. 2025. Revisiting concepts of thermal physiology: understanding negative feedback and set-point in mammals, birds, and lizards. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70002
For other misconceptions in thermoregulation papers see:
Tattersall Lab (TEMP) 